Legal Opinion
Edsall v. Anne Arundel County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 8, 1993No. 44 September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-304(a) the Court of Special Appeals certified to this Court a question generated by two cases pending before it: Edsall v. Anne Arundel County and Layton v. Layton. The question certified is:
If a notice of appeal is filed prior to the withdrawal or disposition of a timely filed motion under Rule 2-532, 2-533, or 2-534, must a new notice of appeal be filed within 30 days after withdrawal or disposition of the motion, or does the earlier filed notice of appeal suffice to constitute a timely appeal?
The facts of the Edsall case most clearly present the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. David JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gustavo Larios CortesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thomas Howard GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City v. Fells Point Cafe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Redemptorists v. Coulthard Services, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Edgewood Management Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Reuter v. ReuterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Carr v. LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.