Legal Opinion
Brown v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1991No. 90-2721PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Walter S. and Diane K. Brown appeal a district court1 order substituting the United States as sole defendant in their tort action against six employees of the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”), and dismissing the action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680. The Browns argue that the district court erred in denying their post-removal motion to remand and in substituting the United States for the individual defendants, which has the effect of foreclosing their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Westfall v. ErwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Connie JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry WILEY, Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Mike Tonelli Cindy Tonelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.