Legal Opinion

Hill v. Mobile Auto Trim, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1987No. C-4996Published

1Opinion of the Court

725 S.W.2d 168 (1987)

Joel HILL, Petitioner,

v.

MOBILE AUTO TRIM, INC., Respondent.

No. C-4996.

Supreme Court of Texas.

January 28, 1987.

Dissenting Opinion March 18, 1987.

Concurring Opinion on Motion for Rehearing March 18, 1987.

Tom S. McCorkle, McCorkle & Westerburg, Dallas, for petitioner.

Roger Turner, Dallas, for respondent.

KILGARLIN, Justice.

Based on a covenant not to compete in a franchise agreement, Mobile Auto Trim, Inc. sought to enjoin Joel Hill, a former franchisee, from competing with it in a seven-county area. The trial court granted the temporary injunction. The court of appeals, with…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1968

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API