Legal Opinion

Diebold v. Vanderstek

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1990No. 90-223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This is a slip and fall case. On December 17, 1984, the appellant, Ralph Diebold, fell on the parking lot of a shopping center owned by the appellees, Arthur and Grace Vanderstek d/b/a Vanguard Properties. Diebold filed a complaint on December 4, 1987, and alleged that his fall and injuries resulted from having stepped on a green, slimy substance that had accumulated on the parking lot through the Vandersteks’ negligence.

The trial court granted the Vandersteks’ motion for summary judgment, and Diebold appeals claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collyard v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Turner v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. McKay v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Lemay v. W & R Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Sanders v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Cowan v. Ellison Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Cowan v. Ellison Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API