Legal Opinion
In Re Timmerman
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided December 10, 2007No. 19-00167PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM L. EDMONDS, Chief Judge.
Debtors Dean and Ann Timmerman move to dismiss their chapter 7 case. Several creditors and parties have objected. These include case trustee Larry S. Eide; Habbo G. Fokkena, the United States trustee; and three creditors — Farmers Cooperative Company, Crow’s Hybrid Seed Company, and Ag Partners, LLC.
Timmermans assert that the case must be dismissed because at the outset of the case, they failed to meet the eligibility requirements of Title 11. They say they had not obtained credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).
Hearing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hossaini v. Western Missouri Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- In the Matter of Atlas Supply Corporation, Debtor. Gail Lee Peterson v. Atlas Supply CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Turpen v. Eide (In Re Turpen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Mendez v. Salven (In Re Mendez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hedquist v. Fokkena (In Re Hedquist)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- In Re JabarinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re FiorilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- In re OsborneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re DiniUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.