City of Kannapolis v. City of Concord
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
This appeal involves attempts by two municipalities to annex the same area, Lake Concord and its watershed, which abuts the City of Kannapolis, and which, prior to annexation by the City of Concord of the intervening tract, was separated from that city by an intervening tract of land consisting of eight parcels. The issue presented by defendant Concord’s cross-appeal is whether the North Carolina annexation statutes permit a municipality to annex by voluntary means a tract of land that is contiguous with its municipal boundaries only by virtue of a second tract of land that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. Town of Benson, Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Town of Hazelwood v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Spencer v. Town of East SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Town of Spencer v. Town of East SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- U.S. Cold Storage v. City of LumbertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Ashley v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- City of Kannapolis v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.