Center for Biological Diversity v. Abraham
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this case, plaintiffs, three environmental organizations, seek enforcement of certain provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. These provisions relate to alternative fuel vehicles, or AFVs. Alternative fuel vehicles are vehicles capable of operating on alcohol-based fuels, natural gas, biomass fuels, electricity, and other sources aside from petroleum. Defendants are eighteen…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Veterans for Common Sense v. PeakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Californians for Renewable Energy v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Center for Biological Diversity v. BrennanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. HellmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.