Legal Opinion
Jehnings v. Allison
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 12, 1988No. C87-146; CA A45552PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*416RIGGS, J.
pro tempore.
Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in this quantum meruit action for the reasonable value of landscaping goods and services. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in failing to grant them a directed verdict on the theory that plaintiffs’ action is barred by ORS 671.625. That section provides:
“(1) The board shall by rule adopt minimum standards for written contracts and billings of the landscaping businesses. The standards shall set forth requirements for information that must be contained in contracts and billings. The information required shall be…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Rhorer v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Valley Excavating, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Ellers, Oakley, Chester & Rike, Inc. v. St. Louis Air Cargo Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ellers v. St. Louis Air Cargo ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Jehnings v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.