Legal Opinion
United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 16, 2010No. CIV S-09-2445 JAM EFBPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On October 7, 2010, Sierra Pacific Industries (hereafter “SPI”) filed a motion to recuse the undersigned. The government submitted its opposition to the motion on October 27, 2010, and SPI submitted a reply brief on November 3, 2010. The matter was heard and submitted on November 10, 2010. For-the reasons stated below, the motion for recusal is denied.
Two weeks before SPI filed the recusal motion, the court had held a hearing on SPI’s motion for additional discovery and the United States’ motion for a protective order. SPI had asked for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Hinman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Redding v. ProSight Specialty Management Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2015
- United States v. Sierra Pacific IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- (HC) Moreno v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (HC) Smith v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC) Rodriguez v. LongiaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.