People v. Brophy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, Acting P. J.
Defendant, Jack Dean Brophy, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon his plea of nolo contendere 1 to a single count of possessing methamphetamine for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.) Defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained under six search warrants.
According to the affidavit submitted in support of the initial warrant, Detective Geaslin, a deputy sheriff for Sonoma County, talked by telephone with a postal inspector in Omaha, Nebraska at about 9:30 on the morning of June 21, 1989. The postal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WindhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Tschanz CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. WindhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Richardson v. BacerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020