Legal Opinion

MacK v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1933No. Docket No. 9065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover a penalty on a real estate broker’s bond. The cause was tried without a jury and findings and judgment were for the bonding company. Prior to trial the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed as to the brokers.

The appeal presents a single question of fact. During the year 1931 the plaintiff delivered to the brokers at various times sums of money to be used by the brokers in the purchase of two lots owned by the Ellis Landing and Dock Company. The full purchase price was fixed at $5,400. When the first payment was made the plaintiff accepted a receipt from the brokers…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cundiff v. WillsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. of New York v. BasilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API