Legal Opinion

Blosser v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2015No. S063528 (Control); S063532PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

In these consolidated cases, petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 46 (2016) (IP 46), contending that the caption, the “yes” result statement, and the summary do not comply with requirements set out in ORS 250.035(2). We review the certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out that standard). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification of the caption, the “yes” result statement, and the summary.

IP…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Novick/Crew v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Greenberg v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Blosser/Romain v. Rosenblum (IP 45)Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blosser/Romain v. Rosenblum (IP 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API