Legal Opinion

State v. Hinman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an indictment under c. 182, Gen. Laws, for practising dentistry without a dental degree or license. The respondent demurred upon the ground that the statute is unconstitutional.

The object of the statute upon which the indictment is founded is to secure the possession of the requisite skill and learning by practitioners of medicine, surgery, and dentistry. The possession of such special qualifications as to knowledge and skill is so essential to the protection of the lives, health, and comfort of the people of the state, that it cannot be doubted that it is within the power of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Powell v. State Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CreditorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. State v. DoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Mayor of Vicksburg v. MullaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Challis v. LakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API