Legal Opinion

G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Vaughn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1890No. 3392PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Runnels County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§182. Common carrier; 'liability of for conduct of connecting line; if it contracts to deliver goods beyond its own line, cannot limit its common-law liability to injuries occurring on its own line; case stated. This suit was in*270stituted in the county court to recover damages to a shipment of cattle from Talpa, Tex., 'to Chicago, 111., and for the failure to deliver thirteen head of said cattle at Chicago, it being alleged that appellant had contracted to carry the same from Talpa to Chicago over its own and connecting lines. -The appellant pleads general denial and special…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Satterwhite v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. G., H. & H. R'y Co. v. AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. SealesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API