Stratemeyer v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
In Allen v. State, 91 Md.App. 775, 605 A.2d 994, cert. denied, State v. Threatt, 328 Md. 92, 612 A.2d 1315 (1992), we held that the forfeiture of a defendant’s motor vehicle pursuant to Md.Code art. 27, § 297, on the ground that the vehicle had been used to transport a controlled dangerous substance, did not constitute a punishment for purposes of Federal or State double jeopardy law and therefore did not preclude the State from prosecuting criminal charges against the defendant arising from the possession of that substance.
We are called upon now to reconsider that holding…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Price v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State v. RezinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- One 1984 Ford Truck Vin 1FTCF15F1ENA87898 v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Mayor of Baltimore v. One 1995 Corvette Vin No. 1G1YY22P585103433Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.