General Electric Co. v. McLaren
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 726,293 for a process for exhausting incandescent lamps, granted to John W. Howell, April 28, 1903. On rule to show cause why defendant should not be adjudged guilty of contempt for violation of injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
Upon application of the complainant on ex parte affidavits, this court allowed a rule to show cause why the defendant should not be adjudged guilty of contempt of court for violation of an injunction prohibiting him from making lamps or practicing the process of letters patent No. 726,293 in exhausting lamps, or from in any way further infringing upon said letters patent. The injunction was served on the defendant on the 13th day of January, 1905, and was issued pursuant .to the final. decree of this court in said cause, made in the month of January aforesaid; a decree…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Accumulator Co. v. Consolidated Electric Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1892
- Smith v. HalkyardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1884
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. FrolloehrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fox v. Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Hanley v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- City of Campbell, Mo. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- In re WeisbergDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
- Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.