Legal Opinion

In re Weisberg

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 15, 1918No. 2105PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Bankruptcy, in the matter of Julius Weisberg, bankrupt. On petition of bankrupt to punish a creditor for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a petition by the bankrupt, asking that the respondent, one of his creditors, be punished for contempt of court in ignoring a discharge in bankruptcy granted to the bankrupt by this court, and garnishing certain money belonging to petitioner and on deposit in a bank, and praying that respondent be ordered to return such money to petitioner.

The petitioner was duly adjudicated a voluntary bankrupt herein, in August, 1916. Among the debts owing by the bankrupt was an indebtedness to one Frank Majuchowsky, the respondent, on a judgment *834rendered by one of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Dimock v. Revere Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Garrigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
  4. Hanley v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. Hellman v. GoldstoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Helms v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  3. In re HavensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Wright (In Re Wright)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980
  5. Standley v. Western Auto Supply CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API