Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1984No. 8314SC1090PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The two main questions presented by this appeal are whether the evidence seized when defendant was arrested should have been suppressed because the search violated either North Carolina law or the United States Constitution, and whether defendant was legally prejudiced by his case being tried when it was, though it had been scheduled for sentencing, rather than trial. We answer both these questions in the negative and hold that defendant’s trial was without reversible error.

One ground for nullifying the search of his premises that defendant asserts is that the search violated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. VickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. SumpterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API