Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Kingston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

The bill herein was filed to reform a deed, it being claimed that Fidelia Bliss, the mother of Jessie Blanchard, and now deceased, intended to convey to plaintiffs four lots in the village of Tekonsha, but by mistake of the scrivener the deed as executed covered but two of the lots. Defendants, who are heirs at law of the grantor, claimed that the lots were purchased by Mrs. Bliss with money received from insurance upon a farm house, in which property she only had a life estate and such insurance constituted a trust fund for their benefit as remaindermen and, *633therefore, not only the lots…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PepperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Welsh v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. In re Cameron's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Convis v. Citizens' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Spalding v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gorman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Farmers' Mutual Fire & Lightning Insurance v. CrowleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. King v. KingMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API