Legal Opinion

King v. King

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1932No. 30115PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The complainant, Charles Hill King, exhibited his bill in equity against Mamie Louise King and several insurance companies in which it was alleged that Charles Hill King owned a fee in certain real and personal property as remainderman, and that the defendant, Mamie Louise King, owned a life interest in said property, which she had insured for her benefit for the sum of ten thousand dollars on the building and the household furnishings therein. The bill further alleged that the property had been destroyed by fire resulting in a total loss in the amount of the policies, and that Mamie…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Harrison v. PepperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Welsh v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Thompson v. GearheartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gorman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Converse v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Rogge v. Menard County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1960
  4. Necaise v. USAA Cas. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ellerbusch v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API