Legal Opinion

Brent v. Keesler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 1969PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 11 consolidated actions by an attorney at law to recover fees for professional services rendered, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 15, 1968, denying appellants’ motion to vacate the judgments which had been entered separately in favor of plaintiff in each of the 11 actions upon jury verdicts on the quantum meruit causes of action. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion remanded to the Justice who presided at the trial of the actions for the purposes hereinafter mentioned. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed.…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart v. Albany Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Tesser v. Allboro Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Condren v. GraceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API