Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Zimmerman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1904No. L.A. No. 1424PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal is from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon the judgment-roll alone.

The action is to recover five hundred dollars deposit paid by the assignor of the plaintiff on an agreement for the sale of land by the defendants. The amended complaint sets out the agreement in full. It was entered into the twenty-fifth day of January, 1902, between B.F. Lyttle, of Los Angeles, as the party of the first part, and Mrs. H.P. Zimmerman and H.P. Zimmerman, her husband, of the county of Riverside, the party of the second part. The party of the second part to the agreement, in consideration of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hannah v. WahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Frissell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API