Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abate v. Mundt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1969Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Fuld (dissenting in part).

I agree that the Municipal Home Rule Law (§ 10, subd. 1, par. a, cl. [13], sub cl. [b]) permits a Town Supervisor to serve on the County Legislature and requires that he stand separately for election to that body. I cannot, however, subscribe to the court’s decision that the reapportionment plan adopted by the board in this case satisfies the demands of the Equal Protection Clause. In my view, the apportionment standards which apply to the States also apply to municipalities — e.g., counties, cities and towns—which exercise general governmental functions.

A…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Fortson v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API