Legal Opinion

Sipple v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 2003No. 592-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted by the trial court of driving while intoxicated. The trial court followed the plea agreement and sentenced the appellant to 180 days in jail, probated for one year, and a $500 fine. The appellant had filed a pre-trial motion to suppress and filed a timely general notice of appeal. The general notice of appeal did not meet the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(b)(3). The Court of Appeals notified the appellant that her notice of appeal did not comply with Rule 25.2(b)(3). The appellant filed an amended notice of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Bayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Sipple v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas Blair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Thomas J. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  3. William Ray Gearhart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API