Legal Opinion

McCoach v. Bowen

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 5, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-1958 (JFG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERRY, Chief Judge:

This is an application for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”). The unique factual circumstances underlying this application present an interesting question of statutory interpretation: Whether a party that secures an entitlement commencing at a date later than it originally requested might be considered a “prevailing party” within the meaning of the EAJA. In addition, this motion engages the court in a task that is all too familiar in this Circuit — that of determining whether agency action which was found not to be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. George R. WEAKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Wallis D. CORNELLA, Appellant, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hull v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
  2. Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API