McCoach v. Bowen
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge:
This is an application for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”). The unique factual circumstances underlying this application present an interesting question of statutory interpretation: Whether a party that secures an entitlement commencing at a date later than it originally requested might be considered a “prevailing party” within the meaning of the EAJA. In addition, this motion engages the court in a task that is all too familiar in this Circuit — that of determining whether agency action which was found not to be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- George R. WEAKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Wallis D. CORNELLA, Appellant, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hull v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
- Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989