Legal Opinion

Kinney v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1927No. 1432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of certain saddles, of the value of $163.75, and from a sentence pursuant to the conviction, he has appealed.

It is assigned as error that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the verdict. The saddles in question, seven in number, were located on the Carey ranch in Converse County, Wyoming, and were stolen therefrom on the night of June 7, 1924, or possibly on the night of June 6, 1924. To show that the defendant had an opportunity to commit the crime, the state produced testimony that at the time of this theft the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SorrentinoWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. MinnickOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. People v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mendicoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CostinWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. SchloredtWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API