Legal Opinion
Jersey City Redevelopment Authority v. PRG Industries
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 17, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-2014PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
In this action concerning the financial responsibility for the cleanup of a contaminated site, defendants PPG Industries, A. Ambrosio & Sons Contracting, Inc., and Clif Associates and Lawrence Construction Co. move for partial summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
The parties stipulated to the following facts in the final pretrial order filed January 6, 1987. Paragraph references are to that order.
From 1954 through 1964, defendant PPG Industries, Inc., (PPG) owned and operated a plant which processed chromium ore, located on Garfield Avenue in Jersey City, NJ. (118) The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- T & E INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Safety Light Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States GypsumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Bowen Engineering v. Estate of ReeveDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.