Legal Opinion
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided July 11, 2007No. 052604BLS2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gants, Ralph D., J.
The plaintiffs, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (“Watts Water”) and Watts Regulator Company (“Watts Regulator”), move for partial summary judgment on Counts I and IV of their First Amended Complaint. Specifically, Watts Water and Watts Regulator ask this Court: (1) to declare that the defendants Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) jointly and severally have a duty to pay the attorneys fees and costs incurred to defend Watts Water and Watts Regulator against any lawsuit alleging bodily injury from asbestos that took place…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peabody Essex Museum, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Northern Security Insurance v. Sandpiper Village Condominium TrustMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Northern Security Insurance v. R.H. Realty TrustMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
- UniFirst Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
- Watts Water Technologies, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009