Legal Opinion
Louis v. Barthelme
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff-landlord commenced this action for a declaration that defendant is not entitled to succeed to the rights of a rent-controlled tenant of the apartment in question and that *605plaintiff should be accorded immediate possession and a judgment granted ejecting defendant therefrom. According to the complaint, Donald Barthelme, now deceased, was the tenant-of-record of the premises and, at the time of his death, was residing in Houston, Texas and had done so for some years and that defendant, who was the deceased’s wife and is now the representative of his estate, had lived with him in Texas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Crow v. 83rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Park House Partners, Ltd. v. DeIrazabalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Metzendorf v. 130 West 57 Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Greenberg v. Coronet Properties Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. DiamondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Navarra v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- 200 East 27th LLC v. Schiffmiller-NachshenNew York Supreme Court · 2005