Legal Opinion

State v. Pless

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2018No. COA18-21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*342 Defendant appeals from convictions of several drug-related offenses. The trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence regarding the pretrial identification using his DMV photograph, and the trial court did not err by admitting evidence of the identification and weight of the controlled substances from a substitute analyst who did her own independent analysis of machine-generated data. We therefore affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress and find no error as to the admission of evidence.

I. Background

Detective Jessica Jurney…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pless v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
  2. State v. RomanoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API