State v. Pless
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
*342 Defendant appeals from convictions of several drug-related offenses. The trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence regarding the pretrial identification using his DMV photograph, and the trial court did not err by admitting evidence of the identification and weight of the controlled substances from a substitute analyst who did her own independent analysis of machine-generated data. We therefore affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress and find no error as to the admission of evidence.
I. Background
Detective Jessica Jurney…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pless v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- State v. RomanoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019