Application of Lilienfeld
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office (hereinafter referred to as the board) wherein the decision of the Primary Examiner (hereinafter referred to as the examiner) finally rejecting claims 23, 24 and 26 of the involved application of appellant, was affirmed as to claim 26, but reversed as to claims 23 and 24. The only claim before us on appeal, therefore, is claim 26. Eleven claims, including Nos. 23 and 24, stand allowed.
Claim 26 reads as follows:
“An anode structure for electrolytic condensers suitable for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Application of ShackellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
3Cited by1 opinion
- Application of John L. Margaroli and Earl J. HesseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963