Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Appling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

223 Or. 576 (1960)

355 P.2d 760

STATE OF OREGON EX REL SMITH

v.

APPLING

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued September 8, 1960.

Demurrer overruled; peremtory writ of mandamus issued September 9, 1960.

Lamar Tooze and Lamar Tooze, Jr., both of Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for plaintiff.

E.G. Foxley, Deputy Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for defendant. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

DEMURRER OVERRULED; PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDAMUS ISSUED.

WARNER,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State Ex Rel. Burns v. LacklenMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States Nat. Bank v. SheflerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Earley v. BatchelorWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API