Legal Opinion

Enter v. Quesse

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Pressley, J., Charleston, April, 1888. The opinion fully states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Ciiiee Justice Simpson.

The plaintiff, respondent, instituted the proceedings below to enforce a mechanic’s lien for the sum of $205, on certain premises of the defendants, Quesse and Greber, claiming priority over a mortgage of defendant, Young. The defendants answered, denying plaintiff’s claim.

The case was referred to the master. At the reference, on February 10, 1888, when the plaintiff closed his testimony, the defendants, Quesse and Greber, having entered upon the defence, but not closing, the reference was adjourned, and on February 27, 1888,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Van Valen v. LaphamThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Borne Scrymser Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. W. T. Furguson Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Columbia National Bank v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Borne Scrymser Co. v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1933
  5. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. EaddySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API