Enter v. Quesse
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Pressley, J., Charleston, April, 1888. The opinion fully states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Ciiiee Justice Simpson.
The plaintiff, respondent, instituted the proceedings below to enforce a mechanic’s lien for the sum of $205, on certain premises of the defendants, Quesse and Greber, claiming priority over a mortgage of defendant, Young. The defendants answered, denying plaintiff’s claim.
The case was referred to the master. At the reference, on February 10, 1888, when the plaintiff closed his testimony, the defendants, Quesse and Greber, having entered upon the defence, but not closing, the reference was adjourned, and on February 27, 1888,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Van Valen v. LaphamThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
3Cited by5 opinions
- Texas Co. v. Borne Scrymser Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- W. T. Furguson Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Columbia National Bank v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Borne Scrymser Co. v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1933
- Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. EaddySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940