Legal Opinion

Lantsman v. Lantsman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 22, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner sought review pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of two protective orders issued against him by the Middlesex Probate and Family Court and the Brookline District Court while he allegedly had been incarcerated. A single justice of this court denied the petition for relief and the petitioner appealed. We affirm.

A request for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is properly denied where the petitioning party has or had an adequate and effective avenue to seek and obtain the requested relief other than G. L. c. 211, § 3. Plymouth & Brockton Street Ry. v. Leyland, 422 Mass. 526, 530-531…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Greco v. Suffolk Division of the Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Smith v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Adams v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sabree v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Watson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Rasheed v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Scott v. District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Suburban Electric Contracting, Inc. v. OzdemirMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API