Lantsman v. Lantsman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner sought review pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of two protective orders issued against him by the Middlesex Probate and Family Court and the Brookline District Court while he allegedly had been incarcerated. A single justice of this court denied the petition for relief and the petitioner appealed. We affirm.
A request for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is properly denied where the petitioning party has or had an adequate and effective avenue to seek and obtain the requested relief other than G. L. c. 211, § 3. Plymouth & Brockton Street Ry. v. Leyland, 422 Mass. 526, 530-531…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Greco v. Suffolk Division of the Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Smith v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Adams v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sabree v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Watson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Rasheed v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Scott v. District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Suburban Electric Contracting, Inc. v. OzdemirMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023