Legal Opinion
United States v. Texas & N. O. R. Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 8, 1926No. Nos. 700, 765PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
In the above cases the United States government, as plaintiff, has charged the defendants with a violation of the act of Congress known as the Safety Appliance Act, approved March 2, 1893 (27 Stat. 531), as amended by an act approved April 1, 1896 ( 29 Stat. 85), as amended by an act approved March 2, 1903 (32 Stat. 943), and as modified by an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission of June 6, 1910; the original act purported to have been violated being as follows:
“From and after the first day of January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Galveston, H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hiatt v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- United States v. South Buffalo R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In Re the Estate of CoffinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- United States v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.