Legal Opinion
Athalie Irvine Smith v. The James Irvine Foundation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1968No. 22607PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff - appellant, Athalie Irvine Smith, is a citizen of the State of Virginia while, for the purposes of Federal jurisdiction, all defendants-appellees are citizens of the State of California. Jurisdiction in the district court was thus invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and was based on diversity of citizenship. It is undisputed that the law of California applies.
The district court, in its learned and exhaustive memorandum opinion, Smith v. The James Irvine Foundation, 277 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lee E. Coombs and Judy B. Coombs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, James C. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,273 Securities and Exchange Commission v. C. R. Richmond & Co., and Curtis R. RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.