Middlebrooks v. Mayne
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Hutchins. Oconee superior court. July term, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
The motion for a new trial contained a large number of grounds. We shall not undertake to discuss in detail the facts of the case, nor all the legal questions involved. We think that the case, upon its merits, is controlled by the rules of law announced in the head-notes, and that the jury returned the proper verdict under the evidence. Most, if not all, of the legal questions have been definitely settled by repeated adjudications of this court, and are no longer left in uncertainty. We will therefore very briefly notice the points involved, in the order in which they are…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Poultryland Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Southern Railway Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Roberts v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Blackstock v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.