Legal Opinion
Purbeck v. Wilkinson
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 27, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00047Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ROBERT PURBECK, Case No. 1:21-cv-00047-BLW Plaintiff, INITIAL REVIEW ORDER OF v. AMENDED COMPLAINT BY SCREENING JUDGE ROBERT MONTY WILKINSON et al, Defendants. The Clerk of Court conditionally filed Plaintiff Robert Purbeck’s Amended Complaint as a result of his in forma pauperis request. Dkt. 19. The Court now reviews the Amended Complaint to determine whether it or any of the claims contained therein should be summarily dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Having screened the First Amended Complaint, the Court enters the following order…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.