Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Murello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed *975November 22,1983, which held the employer liable for contributions on the remuneration paid to claimant for the audit period from October 1, 1982 to December 31, 1982.
Adams Darcy Art, Inc. (Adams) is a commercial art studio which prepares advertising sales promotional material. During peak business periods, Adams hired part-time mechanical artists in addition to those already on its staff. Claimant was first hired in this capacity in October of 1982. The record discloses that claimant did all of her work for Adams on its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Claim of WatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re the Claim of WatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re Foundation for the Open Eye, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re Poly Painters, LtdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of AdamoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of PitcairnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of IbarraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matter of DeVaul (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of KesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985