Legal Opinion
In Re the Claim of Watz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree that there is not substantial evidence in . the record to sustain the determination of the appeal board that the relationship between claimant and Equitable Life Assurance Society was that of employee-employer during the period January 1, 1974 through December 1, 1974.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by16 opinions
- In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mehtani v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Claim of WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re Mid-Hudson Publications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Claim of BedinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.