Legal Opinion

Bigham Bros. v. Port Arthur Canal & Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the District Court of Jefferson County. Tried below before Hon. L. B. Hightower, Jr.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

We copy from appellant’s brief the following concise statement of the nature and result of this suit:

“Bigham Brothers, a partnership composed of S. E. Bigham and W. F. Bigham, plaintiffs in error, filed their original petition in the District Court of Jefferson County complaining of the Port Arthur Canal & Dock Company, as defendant, on September 2, 1903, and their first amended original petition on April 4, 1904, to which, on first trial, demurrers were sustained, and they appealed to this court, whose opinion is reported in 91 S. W., 848; and later writ of error was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houston Water Works v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Perrine v. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Bigham Bros. v. Port Arthur Channel & Dock Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lyles v. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillam v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. NorrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API