Legal Opinion

Stone v. Salisbury

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ricks

On April 16, 1900, the appellants, Mary Snell Stone and Albert J. Stone, her husband, filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county to set aside the will of Henrietta Snell, deceased. The bill alleges that appellant Mary Snell Stone is a daughter and heir-at-law of Henrietta Snell, and after designating the other heirs-at-law and setting out the will and alleging that the same was duly exhibited in the probate court and letters thereon issued to the executrix and trustees under the will and the trust accepted by them, charg'es that the attesting witnesses did not sign the said will at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Orthwein v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Way v. WayIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Riverside Co. v. TownshendIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Guild v. HullIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephens v. CollisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fraley v. BoydAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Sugrue v. CrilleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Prescott v. AyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bochner v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API