Legal Opinion

MR CROSSMAN v. Meek

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This case involves the partition and sale of 80 acres of land in Pinal County, Arizona.

On April 11, 1973, appellee Marcellus R. Meek, filed a complaint alleging that he owned an undivided 1 23Í2th interest in certain land as a tenant in common with the appellants, all of whom owned a greater percentage of interest than appellee. The complaint alleged that the value of the property was $6,000 and prayed that it be partitioned, sold and the proceeds distributed to the parties in proportion to their respective shares.

Although all the appellants were duly served with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wiesel v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Davis v. SolariTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Homecraft Corp. v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Stoltz v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Koay v. KoayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API