Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gaebler v. New Mexico Potash Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1996No. 1-95-2869PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE TULLY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, David B. Gaebler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this purported class action against New Mexico Potash Corporation and other United States and Canadian corporations involved in the potash industry, alleging violations of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (hereinafter the Consumer Fraud Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1994)). The action purported to represent indirect purchasers of potash. Defendants moved to dismiss the action pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Laughlin v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Noyola v. Board of Educ. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Batson v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API