Legal Opinion
Kauffman v. Marlborough Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1929No. 22092. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
This action was brought by the respondent to recover a commission of ten thousand dollars claimed to be due by reason of services in effecting an exchange for other property of certain real estate belonging to the appellant. From a judgment allowing the commission, this appeal is prosecuted.
Respondent bases bis right of action on the following letter:
“Marlborough House “Boren Avenue and University Street “Seattle
“December 17, 1928
“Mr. B. Kauffman
“Seattle, Wash.
“Dear Sir:
“I hand you herewith letter of even date relative to the sale of the Marlborough House, Lot One (1) and Four (4), Block One…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Schmidt v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Johnson v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Thompson, Swan & Lee v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Kahlich v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936