Legal Opinion

Kauffman v. Marlborough Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1929No. 22092. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This action was brought by the respondent to recover a commission of ten thousand dollars claimed to be due by reason of services in effecting an exchange for other property of certain real estate belonging to the appellant. From a judgment allowing the commission, this appeal is prosecuted.

Respondent bases bis right of action on the following letter:

“Marlborough House “Boren Avenue and University Street “Seattle
“December 17, 1928
“Mr. B. Kauffman
“Seattle, Wash.
“Dear Sir:
“I hand you herewith letter of even date relative to the sale of the Marlborough House, Lot One (1) and Four (4), Block One…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Schmidt v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Johnson v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Thompson, Swan & Lee v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kahlich v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API