Legal Opinion

Bick Company, Inc. v. George

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1933No. Appeal, 355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

Jesse E. George, Superintendent of Department of Streets and Public Improvements of tbe City of Reading, appeals from the award of a writ of peremptory mandamus commanding him to issue to appellee a permit to connect a drain on appellee’s premises with the house sewer located in the street upon which the property fronts. Upon careful examination of the record in this case and the briefs filed by counsel, we are of opinion no error was committed, and the order of the court below is accordingly affirmed upon the following excerpts from the opinion of the learned president judge who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kilcullen v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Kilcullen v. WebsterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API