Legal Opinion

Keystone Tobacco Co. v. United States Tobacco Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 6, 2002No. CIV.A.00-1415 PLF. No. CIV.A.00-1454 PLFPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Preclude Settlement Discussions with Individual Plaintiffs, filed on November 5, 2002. In their motion, plaintiffs assert that the defendants in this action (collectively, “UST”) sought to take advantage of the interim period between the oral argument of the class certification motion and the Court’s decision on that motion to improperly approach individual putative class members in an attempt to settle the case with as many direct purchasers as possible…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
  4. In re Shell Oil RefineryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Keystone Tobacco Co. v. United States Tobacco Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Camp v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. In re M.L. Stern Overtime LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API