Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided June 16, 2000No. Civil Action 99-S-1161-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COODY, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
The plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County seeking compensatory and punitive damages and, purportedly, an injunction on a class wide basis against Blue Cross for its alleged refusal to comply with ALA. CODE § 27-51-1 (1975) (the “Physician Assistant Statute”). 1 Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that Blue Cross has failed to pay claims for medical services provided •by physician assistants covered under various Blue Cross contracts. 2 Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, requiring…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hobbs v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Hinojosa v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Hobbs v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Norman Hobbs v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Norman Hobbs v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001