Legal Opinion
Chiles v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 7, 2013No. Case No. 3:06-cv-96-J-25 JBTPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENRY LEE ADAMS, JR., District Judge.
This Cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion To Apply New Jersey Law To Plaintiffs’ Punitive Damages Demand (Dkt. 83) and its Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert Suzanne Parisian (Dkt. 117).
Standard
Expert Witness Testimony
The presentation of scientific and technical knowledge or opinion testimony by a “witness qualified as an expert” is permitted under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence where such testimony:(1) is based upon sufficient facts or data;(2) is the product of reliable principles and methods;(3) results from the reliable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Hendrix Ex Rel. Gp v. Evenflo Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Krause v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2013
- Mathews v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.