Maier Brewing Co. v. Flora Crane Service, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID, J. pro tem.*
Appellant appeals from an order quashing and vacating service of summons on respondents, '.Robert H. Flora and Quentin L. Kopp. The complaint was for malicious prosecution. A second cause of action alleged that the defendants conspired with each other to cause inclusion of appellant as a defendant in an Alameda County action, terminated favorably to appellant on October 20, 1965. A malicious prosecution action must be brought within one- year. . (Department of Mental Hygiene v. Hsu, 213 Cal.App.2d 825 [29 Cal.Rptr. 244].)
1' On May 8, 1967, service purportedly was made upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hill v. WratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Lipman v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Herschfelt v. Knowles-Raymond Granite Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schroeter v. LowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Motor City Sales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016